Revisiting Program Accreditation and its Implication to Quality Assurance Management Culture of a Higher Education Institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v10i2.3232Keywords:
program accreditation, quality assurance, quality assurance management system, shared cultureAbstract
The study revisits the extent to which accreditation procedures are implemented, examines the problems encountered during the accreditation process, and identifies the best practices that contribute to effective program accreditation. In addition, it explores how these elements influence the development of the quality assurance management culture within a higher education institution. Key components, including strategic leadership, management support, the attitudes and commitment of task force members, efficient records/file storage management, and effective communication, are all vital in shaping the shared culture model of the quality assurance management system. This model emphasizes a collegial, collaborative, and inclusive approach to management, where stakeholders work together toward a unified goal. It fosters a positive, forward-moving vision of learning that aligns with the institution's growth and development objectives. Such a culture encourages continuous improvement, collective responsibility, and engagement in accreditation processes, ultimately contributing to the long-term success of the institution’s educational programs. The study aims to provide insights on how these factors interact to build a robust, sustainable quality assurance management framework that supports the overall mission and vision of the institution.
Metrics
References
Alcantara, J., & Mendez, R. (2019). Leadership in higher education: The role of advanced educational attainment. Philippine Journal of Higher Education Leadership, 8(2), 115–128.
Alibin, E., Angelia, R., & Biton, J. (2012). Collaborative efforts in accreditation: The role of stakeholder engagement. Journal of Higher Education Administration, 22(4), 251–265.
Alibin, M. M., Angelia, M. D., & Biton, B. A. (2012). Collaborative practices in accreditation in higher education institutions: A Philippine case study. Philippine Journal of Education.
Alibin, P. A., Angelia, M. M., & Biton, M. D. (2012). The USEP experience in program accreditation: Unified stewardship for excellence and professionalism. In M. T. Corpuz, N. E. Colinares, & M. S. Quesada (Eds.), Quality assurance: Concepts, structures and practices (pp. 293–299). Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities, Inc.
Anane, G. K., & Addaney, M. (2016). Quality assurance and accreditation in higher education: A systems approach. International Journal of Education Research.
Anane, G., & Addaney, M. (2016). Managing quality assurance in higher education: The case of the University of Energy and Natural Resources, Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 7.
Andrade, V. (2018). Gender equality in leadership: A comparative study in Southeast Asian universities. Southeast Asian Journal of Higher Education, 10(1), 24–37.
Cabañero-Verzosa, C. (2014). Responding to accreditation feedback and its impact on institutional development. Philippine Higher Education Review, 19(3), 27–38.
Cabrera, R., & Garcia, M. (2020). Accreditation and quality assurance in higher education: The role of faculty and administrators. Journal of Higher Education Policy, 25(1), 45–58.
Cavite State University. (2009). Manual of operations. Cavite State University.
Civil Service Commission (CSC). (2012). Memorandum Circular No. 10, Series of 2012: Educational requirement for faculty positions in state universities and colleges (SUCs) and local colleges and universities (LUCs).
Collado, R. J., Bernabe Datu-Ramos, Y. E., Espeleta, R. R., Romero, R., & Santos, R. C. (2024). Leadership style dynamics: Informing policy for optimal employee performance in diverse organizational settings. Diversitas Journal, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i2.3016
Commission on Higher Education (CHED). (2012). CHED Memorandum Order No. 46, Series of 2012: Policy-standard to enhance quality assurance in Philippine higher education through an outcomes-based and typology-based quality assurance. https://www.britishcouncil.ph/sites/default/files/annex6_draft_CMO_on_policy_standard_to_enhance_quality_assurance_qa_in_philippine_higher_education_through_an_outcome_-_based_and_typology_based_qa.pdf
Cruzada, E. A., Onate, L. S., & Arinto, P. A. (2012). The challenges of accreditation in higher education: Faculty perspectives on multiple roles and tasks. Educational Research Journal, 5(2), 45–58.
Cruzada, E. C., Onate, L. G., & Arinto, M. B. (2012). Leyte Normal University and accreditation. In M. T. Corpuz, N. E. Colinares, & M. S. Quesada (Eds.), Quality assurance: Concepts, structures and practices (pp. 256–266). Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities, Inc.
Duhaylungsod, A., & Ramos, P. (2020). Career progression and organizational experience: Insights from the Philippine higher education sector. Philippine Journal of Higher Education Management, 9(1), 77–90.
Duhaylungsod, A., & Ramos, P. (2020). Gender dynamics in educational leadership: Shifting roles and opportunities. Philippine Journal of Educational Management, 31(2), 47–62.
Edwards, J. (2005). Quality assurance in higher education: A review of international practices. Higher Education Quarterly.
Edwards, T. (2005). Quality assurance of assessments: A case study. http://ir.cut.ac.za/bitstream/handle/11462/476/Edwards%2C%20Tryna.%20Pages%20p.37-46.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Figueroa, M. N., Kincaid, D. L., Rani, M., & Lewis, G. (2002). Communication for social change working paper series. Rockefeller Foundation. http://archive.cfsc.org/pdf/socialchange.pdf
Gamage, K. A. A., Roshan Pradeep, R. G. G., Najdanovic-Visak, V., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Academic standards and quality assurance: The impact of COVID-19 on university degree programs. Sustainability, 12, 10032.
Gomez, R., Torres, L., & De Leon, M. (2020). Age and decision-making in leadership roles. International Journal of Business and Management, 22(1), 34–46.
Gutierrez, F., & Marquez, M. (2020). Quality assurance and accreditation practices in higher education: A review of Philippine institutions. Philippine Journal of Educational Development, 35(2), 121–134.
Herrera, F., & Requejo, C. (2019). Understanding accreditation: An in-depth analysis of faculty and administrator engagement. Philippine Journal of Educational Leadership, 21(3), 118–132.
Nuestro, C. N. (2012). Familiarity and extent of use of various management techniques by administrators of selected public secondary schools in Cavite province, SY 2011-2012. (Unpublished dissertation). Cavite State University.
Pascua, N., Mendoza, J., & Villanueva, S. (2019). Faculty dynamics: The role of age in teaching effectiveness and curriculum development. Philippine Journal of Education, 27(4), 78–92.
Ramos, S., & Mendoza, L. (2018). Institutional accreditation: Challenges and opportunities for Philippine higher education. Southeast Asian Journal of Higher Education Studies, 14(2), 98–110.
Ruiz, A. J., & Junio-Sabio, C. J. (2012). Quality assurance in higher education in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 66–70.
Santos, A., & Cruz, E. (2021). Trends in academic workforce composition in the Philippines: Implications for higher education institutions. Asian Journal of Education Studies, 8(2), 12–29.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.
Torres, A., & Pascual, M. (2019). The gendered landscape of higher education faculty in the Philippines. Journal of Education Policy and Gender Studies, 16(4), 120–134.
Torres, F., & Pascual, A. (2021). The role of experience in academic leadership and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Policy and Administration, 17(2), 143–158.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 CRISTINA SIGNO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Diversitas Journal expresses that the articles are the sole responsibility of the Authors, who are familiar with Brazilian and international legislation.
Articles are peer-reviewed and care should be taken to warn of the possible incidence of plagiarism. However, plagiarism is an indisputable action by the authors.
The violation of copyright is a crime, provided for in article 184 of the Brazilian Penal Code: “Art. 184 Violating copyright and related rights: Penalty - detention, from 3 (three) months to 1 (one) year, or fine. § 1 If the violation consists of total or partial reproduction, for the purpose of direct or indirect profit, by any means or process, of intellectual work, interpretation, performance or phonogram, without the express authorization of the author, the performer, the producer , as the case may be, or whoever represents them: Penalty - imprisonment, from 2 (two) to 4 (four) years, and a fine. ”
.png){kind=logo}
