Percepções de professores sobre o ensino de Estudos Sociais: uma abordagem fenomenológica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v11i4.3862Palavras-chave:
Abordagem fenomenológica, percepções, Professores, Estudos SociaisResumo
Este estudo explorou as percepções de professores de Estudos Sociais do ensino fundamental II sobre o uso de Sistemas de Gestão da Aprendizagem (LMS, na sigla em inglês). Oito professores do La Union Cultural Institute e do Saint Louis College participaram de entrevistas semiestruturadas presenciais. Utilizando o método fenomenológico descritivo de Giorgi, os dados foram analisados por meio de procedimentos fenomenológicos sistemáticos, incluindo a identificação de unidades de significado, sua transformação e a síntese em temas. Dois temas principais emergiram: a promoção da criatividade por meio do uso de LMS pelos professores e o uso de feedback sistemático para orientar o ensino de Estudos Sociais via LMS. Esses resultados indicam que os LMS facilitam práticas pedagógicas criativas, apoiam a aprendizagem centrada no aluno e viabilizam mecanismos de feedback estruturados. O estudo conclui que as experiências vividas pelos professores destacam o papel dos LMS como uma ferramenta pedagógica que molda estratégias de ensino e aprimora a eficácia do ensino de Estudos Sociais. Recomenda-se que os professores utilizem os recursos dos LMS — como materiais multimídia e ferramentas interativas — para enriquecer o processo de ensino.
Referências
Acala, J., & Dimasacat, A. C. B. (2023). Perceptions on the utilization of learning management system and its effects on the communication skills of private senior high school students in Manila. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies.
Ajijola, E. M., Ogunlade, O. O., Aladesusi, G. A., & Olumorin, C. O. (2021). Perception of learning management system among distance learners in South-West Nigeria. Journal of Digital Learning and Education, 1(2), 72–84.
Aldila, A. S., Supriyono, L. A., Previana, C. N., & Habibie, D. R. (2024). The effectiveness of adaptive learning systems integrated with LMS in higher education. Jurnal KomtekInfo, 49–56.
Alhazi, A. K., Imtiaz, A., Al-Hammadi, F., & Kaed, E. (2021). Success and failure aspects of LMS in e-learning systems. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(11).
Ali, Q., Abbas, A., Raza, A., Khan, M., Zulfiqar, H., Iqbal, M., et al. (2023). Exploring students’ perceived effectiveness of online education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical analysis using structural equation modeling (SEM). Behavioral Sciences, 13(7), 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070578
Almusharraf, A. I. (2024). An investigation of university students’ perceptions of learning management systems: Insights for enhancing usability and engagement. Sustainability, 16(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210037
Allam, H., Dempere, J., Kalota, F., & Hua, D. (2024). Enhancing educational continuity: Exploring factors affecting the success of learning management systems in Dubai higher education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1382021. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1382021
Alzahrani, F. K. J., Alhalafawy, W. S., & Alshammary, F. M. H. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions of Madrasati learning management system (LMS) at public schools in Jeddah.
Anugrah, S., Supendra, D., Jalinus, N., Syahril, S., & Austin, D. A. (2025). The development of a hybrid learning management system with learning styles for creative learning. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.9.3.1021
Annamalai, N., Hashim, M., Mohd Yatim, S. A., Raju, G., Mohamad Yunus, N., & Kamal, S. S. L. A. (2025). Exploring the representation of multiple intelligences in LMS materials. Library Hi Tech.
Aprilia, T., Ardiansyah, A. R., & Riyanti, H. (2023). The feasibility of interactive multimedia and online quiz-based gamification on LMS thematic learning courses. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v11i1.120-133
Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of COVID-19 on higher education students. Sustainability, 12(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438
Artífice, A. F. V. P., Sarraipa, J., & Jardim-Goncalves, R. (2021). Improvement of student attention monitoring in LMS. In Computer-Mediated Communication.
Assaiqeli, A., Maniam, M., Farrah, M., Morgul, E., & Ramli, K. (2023). Challenges of ELT during the new normal. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 23(1), 377–400. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.23.1.20
Auliana, R. (2023). Factors influencing student satisfaction in online learning. Pedagogia Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v13i1.1539
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
Bariham, I., Ondigi, S. R., & Kiio, M. (2021). Preparedness of instructors for online learning. Social Education Research, 52–64.
Borabo, J. G., Diño, I. E., Gueta, J. A., et al. (2024). LMS utilization in Philippine secondary schools. Journal of Community Development Research, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.14456/jcdr-hs.2024.1
Bradley, V. M. (2021). LMS use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36
Budiman, B., Supardi, S., & Sudrajat, S. (2023). Enhancing social sciences learning effectiveness with LMS. Jurnal Kependidikan, 7, 189–203. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v7i2.61782
Cahyani, N. M. W. S., et al. (2021). Blended online learning in EFL. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 18(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v18i2.34659
Elfeky, A. I. M., & Elbyaly, M. Y. H. (2023). Virtual classroom use in LMS. Annals of Forest Research, 66(1), 1980–1990.
Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., & Lencastre, J. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2
Fuady, I., Sutarjo, M. A. S., & Ernawati, E. (2021). Students’ perceptions of online learning media. Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 2(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.47175/rissj.v2i1.177
Furqon, M., et al. (2023). Impact of LMS usage on students. TEM Journal, 12, 1082–1089. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM122-54
Ginting, D. S., et al. (2024). Student-centered learning in the digital age. IJERE, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.2006
Hasan, N., & Bao, Y. (2020). E-learning and psychological distress. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105355
Huang, Q. (2022). Teachers’ intention to use LMS. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2062607
Hussein, E., et al. (2021). Attitudes toward online learning. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105699
Kasumu, R. (2022). LMS in education: Benefits and drawbacks. IJTRET, 7, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.54473/IJTRET.2022.7103
Kerimbayev, N., et al. (2023). Student-centered approach in distance learning. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00261-5
Mahmud, M. E., et al. (2021). LMS in seamless learning. Al-Ishlah, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i2.874
Nisak, S. K. (2024). Optimizing LMS in English learning. Zabags International Journal of Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.66
Puljak, L., et al. (2020). Attitudes toward e-learning. BMC Medical Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02343-7
Rajab, M. H., et al. (2020). Challenges to online education. Cureus, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8966
Setiawan, B., & Rodgers, A. (2024). LMS satisfaction determinants. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v8i2.128
Tseng, H. (2020). LMS utilization and learning community. Research in Learning Technology, 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2322
Ulanday, M. L., et al. (2021). Flexible learning in the new normal. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(2).
Waris, I., & Hameed, I. (2023). Teachers’ acceptance of LMS. Journal of Public Affairs, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2821
Winstone, N., et al. (2021). Student engagement with feedback in LMS. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.182331
Winstone, N. E., & Pitt, E. (2021). Developing feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.182331
Yamamoto, G. T., & Altun, D. (2020). Rise of online education. Journal of University Research, 3(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.711110
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Rowena Tadios, Hannah Camiring Picpican

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
O periodico Diversitas Journal expressa que os artigos são de unica responsabilidade dos Autores, conhecedores da legislação Brasileira e internacional. Os artigos são revisados pelos pares e devem ter o cuidado de avisar da possível incidencia de plagiarismo. Contudo o plagio é uma ação incontestavel dos autores. A Diversitas Journal não publicará artigos com indicios de Plagiarismos. Artigos com plagios serão tratados em conformidade com os procedimentos de plagiarismo COPE.
A violação dos direitos autorais constitui crime, previsto no artigo 184, do Código Penal Brasileiro:
“Art. 184 Violar direitos de autor e os que lhe são conexos: Pena – detenção, de 3 (três) meses a 1 (um) ano, ou multa. § 1o Se a violação consistir em reprodução total ou parcial, com intuito de lucro direto ou indireto, por qualquer meio ou processo, de obra intelectual, interpretação, execução ou fonograma, sem autorização expressa do autor, do artista intérprete ou executante, do produtor, conforme o caso, ou de quem os represente: Pena – reclusão, de 2 (dois) a 4 (quatro) anos, e multa.”













