Fatores que contribuem para o desempenho de estudantes de pós-graduação nos exames abrangentes escritos

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v11i4.4182

Palavras-chave:

Desempenho no Exame Abrangente Escrito, Manual de Operações dos Programas de Pós-Graduação, Fatores Contribuintes, Análise Longitudinal, Fatores Contribuintes, Análise Longitudinal, Variações Específicas por Programa

Resumo

A implementação da política revisada da Bicol University Graduate School (BUGS), ou Manual de Operações dos Programas de Pós-Graduação (Graduate Program Manual of Operations – GPMO), referente aos exames abrangentes escritos, alinhada à Ordem Memorando nº 15, série de 2019, da Comissão de Ensino Superior (Commission on Higher Education – CHED), tem como objetivo fortalecer a garantia da qualidade na educação de pós-graduação. No entanto, um número significativo de estudantes de pós-graduação continua enfrentando dificuldades para obter aprovação no exame. Este estudo investigou os fatores que influenciam o desempenho dos estudantes de pós-graduação nos exames abrangentes escritos realizados desde a implementação da política revisada no ano letivo de 2022–2023. Especificamente, buscou identificar os fatores que afetam o desempenho no exame e fornecer recomendações baseadas em evidências para ampliar o sucesso dos estudantes. Empregando um delineamento descritivo de métodos mistos, o estudo utilizou análise documental de registros institucionais e entrevistas semiestruturadas com estudantes de pós-graduação de diversos programas acadêmicos. Os dados quantitativos foram analisados por meio de estatística descritiva, enquanto as respostas qualitativas foram examinadas por meio de análise temática. Os resultados revelaram sete fatores principais que influenciam o desempenho no exame: preparação e revisão inadequadas; intervalos prolongados entre a conclusão dos requisitos acadêmicos e a realização do exame; percepção de dificuldade e tecnicidade das questões; preocupações relacionadas à saúde e ao bem-estar; responsabilidades acadêmicas, profissionais e pessoais concorrentes; habilidades insuficientes de escrita e ansiedade em relação ao exame; e baixa qualidade das respostas e práticas inadequadas de realização de provas. Esses achados demonstram que o desempenho dos estudantes de pós-graduação é influenciado por uma interação complexa de fatores institucionais, instrucionais e pessoais. O estudo recomenda a implementação de critérios rigorosos de admissão na pós-graduação, programas estruturados de revisão, cursos de nivelamento e atualização, iniciativas de aprimoramento da escrita acadêmica, serviços de bem-estar e aconselhamento, e o fortalecimento da orientação e mentoria acadêmicas. Espera-se que essas intervenções melhorem a preparação dos estudantes, aumentem as taxas de aprovação nos exames abrangentes escritos e reforcem ainda mais as iniciativas de garantia da qualidade da Bicol University Graduate School.

Biografia do Autor

Roldan Cabiles, Bicol University. Legazpi City, Albay, Filipinas

0009-0008-9415-599X; Bicol University. Legazpi City, Albay, Filipinas. Autor correspondente: E-mail: rccabiles@bicol-u.edu.ph

Referências

Akpen, C. N., Asaolu, S., Atobatele, S., Okagbue, H., & Sampson, S. (2024). Impact of online learning on Student’s Performance and Engagement: A Systematic review. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1446854

Albert, C., James, Y., John, B., Herlyn, M., & Liza, J. (2022). Factors and Challenges Influencing the Criminologist Licensure Examination Performance through the Non-passers’ Lens. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.365

Alani, F. S., & Hawas, A. (2021). Factors affecting students academic performance: a case study of Sohar University. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354723769_Factors_Affecting_Students_Academic_Performance_A_Case_Study_of_Sohar_University

Bosco, N. J., Ntawiha, P., & Alexis, A. (2023). Factors contributing to students’ academic performance in biology state examination at Upper secondary Schools in Gitega Commune, Gitega Province in Burundi. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8359718

Borman, K. R. (2006). Does academic intervention impact ABS qualifying examination results? Current Surgery, 63(6), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cursur.2006.06.007

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chick, N. (2013). Metacognition. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved [todaysdate] from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/metacognition/

Damoco, R. A., Dela Cruz, M. J., & Santos, L. P. (2024). Philippine graduate students' perspectives on CMO No. 15 Series 2019 as basis for a conceptual model. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 12(1), 88–97. https://kuey.net/index.php/kuey/article/view/2974

De Boer, H., Donker, A., & Van Der Werf, G. (2014). Effects of the attributes of educational interventions on students’ academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 509–545. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314540006

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the Self-Determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01

DeHaan, C. & Ryan, R. (2014). SDT and the Eudaimonic Tradition. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/self-determination-theory#:~:text=Self%2Ddetermination%20Theory%20(SDT),in%20turn%20predict%20learning%2C%20performance%2C

Garcia, R. A., & Al-Safadi, L. A. (2014). Intervention Strategies for the Improvement of Students’ Academic Performance in Data Structure course. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(5), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2014.v4.435

González-Arias, M., Dibona, P., Soto-Flores, B., Rojas-Puelles, A., Amato, M., Álvarez-Trigo, D., & Castillo, R. (2025). Academic performance, self-reported motivation, and affect in higher education: the role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1519454

Harackiewicz, J. M., & Priniski, S. J. (2018). Improving Student Outcomes in Higher Education: The Science of Targeted Intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 409–435. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011725

Heretape, E. H., & Paglinawan, J. L. (2024). Academic support services and review program initiatives on students’ preparedness for licensure examination. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 07(11), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.37502/ijsmr.2024.71117

Jerman, G. M., Jr. (2023). A Fresh Cut: Improving Barbering Examination Pass Rates with a Curricular Intervention at JIBCA. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Intervention+Mechanisms+addressing+Factors+Affecting+Graduate+Students%e2%80%99+Performance+in+the+Written+Comprehensive+Examinations&id=ED633666

Khazaei, M. R., Khazaei, M., Zarin, A., & Rezaei, M. (2018). Factors affecting the results of comprehensive pre-internship exam among medical students of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Korean J Med Educ, 30(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2018.88

Li, W., & Jiang, X. (2025). How Environment, Cognition, and Behavior Shape Doctoral Students’ Academic Career Intentions: Insights from a Comprehensive Study. Behavioral Sciences, 15(7), 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070990

Lyons, K., Brock, T., Malone, D. T., Freihat, L., & White, P. (2020). Predictors of Pharmacy student performance on written and clinical examinations in a flipped classroom curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(12), 8038. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8038

Mosia, M., Egara, F. O., Nannim, F. A., & Basitere, M. (2025b). Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling of student academic performance: the impact of mathematics competency, institutional context, and temporal variability. Education Sciences, 15(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020177

Munabi, I. G., Mwaka, E. S., Kirum, G. G., Kirwowa, H., Mubuuke, A. G., Kiguli, S., & Buwembo, W. (2020). Effect of an eLearning Intervention on Undergraduate Health Professional Student’s General Histology and Embryology Summative Examination Scores. Open Access Library Journal, 7, e6230. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106230

Nuuyoma, E., Sing, N., Directorate of Quality Assurance and Management, International University of Management (IUM), Windhoek, Namibia, & Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria Groenkloof, South Africa. (2025). Revisiting Tinto’s Student Integration Theory: A framework for understanding doctoral student attrition and enhancing retention Strategies. In INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJRISS) (p. 4095) [Journal-article]. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of Self-regulated Learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Rasul, S., & Bukhsh, Q. (2011). A study of factors affecting students’ performance in examination at university level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2042–2047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.050

Spadafora, N., Murphy, E. L., Molnar, D. S., & Zinga, D. (2020). Test Anxiety in Potential First-Generation Students: A Longitudinal examination of the role of psychological needs. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v14i2.6202

Suleiman, I. B., Okunade, O. A., Dada, E. G., & Ezeanya, U. C. (2024). Key factors influencing students’ academic performance. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43067-024-00166-w

Talaroc, F. R., Ali, A., & Alipio, M. (2021). Factors Associated with Licensure Examination Performance of Radiologic Technology Graduates. IMCC Journal of Science, 1, 46–55. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Contributing+Factors+to+the+Performance+of+Graduate+Students+in+the+Written+Comprehensive+Examinations+&id=ED618547

Walke, Y. S. C., Samuel, L. J., & Bandodkar, L. V. (2015). A cross-sectional comparative study to determine the factors contributing to the academic performance of the high performers and low performers in 2nd year medical students. International Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 1072–1079. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20151334

Wijaya, T. T., Yu, B., Xu, F., Yuan, Z., & Mailizar, M. (2023b). Analysis of Factors Affecting Academic Performance of Mathematics Education Doctoral Students: A Structural equation Modeling approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054518

Downloads

Publicado

2026-11-07

Como Citar

Cabiles, R. (2026). Fatores que contribuem para o desempenho de estudantes de pós-graduação nos exames abrangentes escritos. Diversitas Journal, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v11i4.4182