Evaluation of soil quality through visual indicators in the Marcelo Déda Settlement Project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v8i4.2579Keywords:
Sustainability, Environmental monitoring, Soil managementAbstract
The growing concern about accelerated soil deterioration has led to the need to develop tools that promote agricultural production, based on ambitious concepts. Although the definitions of sustainability and soil quality encompass political, social, economic and environmental issues, many scientific studies address soil quality, but only a few seek to quantify visual indicators of sustainable development, especially in agrarian reform settlements. However, these studies that present simple and easily measured alternatives are indispensable for decision-making and monitoring of agricultural systems. Therefore, the objective of this work was to evaluate soil quality through visual indicators in the Marcelo Déda Settlement Project, located in the municipality of Malhador, Sergipe. For this, 4 significant agricultural crops (Acerola, Macaxeira, Yellow passion fruit and pasture) and an area of native forest of the settlement reserve were chosen. The visual indicators selected are linked to the physical-hydraulic, chemical and biological parameters of the soil, being assigned values (1, 5 and 10) according to the visual degree of impact of the management in these indicators, which were classified in a participatory way with the farmers and researchers. The results allowed to classify the soil of the native forest as desirable in comparison to the land uses in the agricultural production systems studied in the Marcelo Déda Settlement Project, and the areas with the use of aceroleira presented more impacted visual indicators, thus indicating the need for essential changes in the management of the crop.
Metrics
References
Chang, J., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., and Zhu, Y.: Assessing the impact of climate variability and human activities on streamflow variation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1547–1560, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1547-2016, 2016.
Comin, J. J., Fayad, J. A., Kurtz, C., Mafra, Á. L., & Curmi, P. (2016). Guia prático de avaliação participativa da qualidade do solo em Sistemas de Plantio Direto de Hortaliças (SPDH) (p. 16). Open Brasil Gráfica e Editora.
Corrêa, R. M., Freire, M. B. G. dos S., Ferreira, R. L. C., Freire, F. J., Pessoa, L. G. M., Miranda, M. A., & Melo, D. V. M. de. (2009). Atributos químicos de solos sob diferentes usos em perímetro irrigado no semiárido de Pernambuco. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Do Solo, 33(2), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-06832009000200008
Usda – United States Department of Agriculture. 2022.
Ferreira, D. F. (2000). Ferreira, D.F. (2000) Análise estatística por meio do SISVAR (Sistema para Análise de Variancia) para Windows versão 4.0. Proceedings of the 45th Reunião Anual da Região Brasileira da Sociedade Internacional de Biometria, São Carlos-SP, 2000, 255-258.
Fragoso, C.; Kanyonyo, J.; Moreno, A.; Senapati, B. K.; Blanchart, E.; & Rodriguez, C. (1999). Um levantamento de minhocas tropicais:taxonomia, biogeografia e plasticidade ambiental. Manejo de minhocas em agroecossistemas tropicais, 1-26.
Gomes, M. A. F.; Filizola, H. F. (2006). Indicadores Físicos e Químicos de Qualidade de Solo Interesse Agrícola. Embrapa Meio Ambiente. Jaguariúna, 8 p.
Hoffmann, R. B., Nascimento, M. do S. V., Diniz, A. A., Araújo, L. H. A., & Souto, J. S. (2009). DIVERSIDADE DA MESOFAUNA EDÁFICA COMO BIOINDICADORA PARA O MANEJO DO SOLO EM AREIA, PARAÍBA, BRASIL. Revista Caatinga, 22(3). https://periodicos.ufersa.edu.br/caatinga/article/view/1015
Kisaka, M. O.; Shisanya, C.; Cournac, L.; Manlay, J. R.; Gitari, H.; Muriuki, J. Integrating no-tillage with agroforestry augments soil quality indicators in Kenya’s dry-land agroecosystems, Soil and Tillage Research, Volume 227, 2023, 105586, ISSN 0167-1987, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2022.105586.
Leão, T. P., Silva, A. P., Macedo, M. C. M., Imhoff, S., & Euclides, V. P. B. (2004). Intervalo hídrico ótimo na avaliação de sistemas de pastejo contínuo e rotacionado. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Do Solo, 28(3), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-06832004000300002
Pacheco, E. P., & Cantalice, J. R. B. (2011). Compressibilidade, resistência a penetração e intervalo hídrico ótimo de um Argissolo Amarelo cultivado com cana-de-açúcar nos Tabuleiros Costeiros de Alagoas. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Do Solo, 35(2), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-06832011000200010
Rovedder, A. P. M., Eltz, F. L. F., Drescher, M. S., Schenato, R. B., & Antoniolli, Z. I. (2009). Organismos edáficos como bioindicadores da recuperação de solos degradados por arenização no Bioma Pampa. Ciência Rural, 39(4), 1051–1058. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009005000023
Simane, B.; Zaitchik, B. F.; Ozdogan, M. Agroecosystem analysis of the choke mountain watersheds, Ethiopia. Sustainability, 2013.
Solos, E. (2013). Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos: Rio de Janeiro, 3.
Swift, M. J.; Bignell, D.; Moreira, F. D. S.; & Huising, J. (2010). O inventário da biodiversidade biológica do solo: conceitos e orientações gerais. Manual de biologia dos solos tropicais: amostragem e caracterização da biodiversidade. Lavras: Editora da UFLA, 1, 23-41.
Tesfay, F.; Kibret, K.; Gebrekirstos, A.; Hadgu, K.M. (2020). Litterfall production and associated carbon and nitrogen flux along exclosure chronosequence at Kewet district, central lowland of Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-020-00172-7
Velázquez, J.; Tejera, R.; Hernando, A.; & Núñez, M. V. (2010). Diagnóstico ambiental: Integrar a conservação da biodiversidade na gestão dos espaços florestais Natura 2000. Journal for Nature Conservation, 18 (4), 309-317.
Vezzani, F. M.; Ferreira, G. W.; Souza, M.; Comin, J. J. (2019). Conceitos, métodos de avaliação participativa e o SPDH como promotor de qualidadedo solo. In: Sistema de plantio direto de hortaliças. São Paulo: Expressão popular, 1, 105-123.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Thiago Lima da Silva, Jamile Raquel Regazzo, Murilo Mesquita Baesso, Regina Helena Marino, Igor Adriano de Oliveira Reis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Diversitas Journal expresses that the articles are the sole responsibility of the Authors, who are familiar with Brazilian and international legislation.
Articles are peer-reviewed and care should be taken to warn of the possible incidence of plagiarism. However, plagiarism is an indisputable action by the authors.
The violation of copyright is a crime, provided for in article 184 of the Brazilian Penal Code: “Art. 184 Violating copyright and related rights: Penalty - detention, from 3 (three) months to 1 (one) year, or fine. § 1 If the violation consists of total or partial reproduction, for the purpose of direct or indirect profit, by any means or process, of intellectual work, interpretation, performance or phonogram, without the express authorization of the author, the performer, the producer , as the case may be, or whoever represents them: Penalty - imprisonment, from 2 (two) to 4 (four) years, and a fine. ”