Student satisfaction with the heutagogical approach in education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i1.2861Keywords:
Sustainable Education, Technology, Heutagogy Education, Digital EraAbstract
The heutagogical approach places a strong emphasis on learner autonomy and the enhancement of their potential for a self-directed learning, technology utilization also can make it easier to integrate heutagogy in the classroom, improving learning results and increasing learner engagement. Thus, the student satisfaction is an essential element of higher education that can support student achievement. This study aims to describe the satisfaction of Political Science students with the heutagogy approach in education at the Universidad de Manila, Philippines using a descriptive quantitative approach with a survey method. The subjects of this study were the twenty-nine (29) students of the Political Science education program at Universidad de Manila, Philippines who are currently enrolled in Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Political Data (PSC222). The sampling used was purposeful which is a non-probability. The result reveals that the students were very satisfied (62.1%) with the quality of teaching, satisfied (58.6%) with the course content, satisfied (37.9%) with the campus facilities, and very satisfied (55.2%) with the student support and services. The results disclosed that student satisfaction is a vital aspect in higher education as it affects their motivation and academic success, especially in this era of Globalization, Technology, Information and Communication Technology (ICT), is increasing, which forces the world of education to have positive innovations for the advancement of education.
Metrics
References
Abdul Hakim, M. M. S. (2015). Pengurusan Fasiliti. UTM: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Asiabaka, I.P. (2008). Facilities Management in Schools In I.L, Anukam, P.O. & Okunnaniri,
S.U,& R.N.O.Ogbonna. (Eds) Basic Text on Educational Management, Owerri: Chinashop Publisher.
Baum, S. H.. (2014).“How communities can use research to hold school system accountable”,
The Urban Review. 36(1): pp. 37-59 Wan and J. Ivy, Providing access by integrating computer-aided design in mathematics Teacher education courses, J. Digit. Learn. Teach. Educ.,pp. 1–13, 2021.
C. E. Weinstein, Assessment and training ofstudent learning strategies, in Learning strategiesand learning styles, Springer, 2018, pp. 291–316.
E. Salas, K. A. Wilson, C. E. Murphy, H. King,and M. Salisbury, Communicating, coordinating,and cooperating when lives depend on it: tips forteamwork, Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf., vol. 34,no. 6, pp. 333–341, 2008.
Hill, Y., Lomas, L., MacGregor, J. (2003). Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 15-20.
L. M. Blaschke, Self-determined learning(heutagogy) and digital media are creatingintegrated educational environments fordeveloping lifelong learning skills, in The digitalturn in higher education, Springer, 2018, pp. 129–140.
P. A. Bishop, J. M. Downes, and K. Farber,Personalized learning in the middle grades: Aguide for classroom teachers and school leaders.Harvard Education Press, 2021.
Redjeki, E. S., & Moedzakir, D. (2017). Pengembangan Model Pelatihan Heutagogis untuk Pamong Belajar dalam Rangka Peningkatan Kualitas Pengelolaan Program
Richardson, L. P., Mcgowan, C., & Styger, L. (2017). Heutagogy - An updated Approach to Masters Education. Excellence in Service 20th International Conference, September,703–718. http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2361&context=buspapers
S. C. Johnston et al., The discussion about advancedirectives: patient and physician opinionsregarding when and how it should be conducted,Arch. Intern. Med., vol. 155, no. 10, pp. 1025–1030, 2015.
Schwab, K. (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016- 2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Geneva: World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/. UNESCO-United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization ( 2009). Student Affairs and Services in Higher Education: Global Foundations, Issues and Best Practices. Paris
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 IRENE GUMIRAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Diversitas Journal expresses that the articles are the sole responsibility of the Authors, who are familiar with Brazilian and international legislation.
Articles are peer-reviewed and care should be taken to warn of the possible incidence of plagiarism. However, plagiarism is an indisputable action by the authors.
The violation of copyright is a crime, provided for in article 184 of the Brazilian Penal Code: “Art. 184 Violating copyright and related rights: Penalty - detention, from 3 (three) months to 1 (one) year, or fine. § 1 If the violation consists of total or partial reproduction, for the purpose of direct or indirect profit, by any means or process, of intellectual work, interpretation, performance or phonogram, without the express authorization of the author, the performer, the producer , as the case may be, or whoever represents them: Penalty - imprisonment, from 2 (two) to 4 (four) years, and a fine. ”
.png){kind=logo}
