Validation of a blended teaching model from the perspective of engineering students in Islamic Azad University during the COVID-19 pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i3.3013Abstract
The statistical population included all undergraduate students of engineering fields of Islamic Azad University, Shahreri branch, in the second semester of 2021-2022; overall, there were 201 male and female engineering 201 students who were randomly selected. The questionnaire was completed online by students after explaining the research objectives and attracting the participants. After collecting data, SPSS 26 and Smart PLS software were used for analysis
The results showed that the effective factors of face-to-face teaching were: the role of teacher, content and resources, teaching materials, growth and development, the role of family, learning strategies, evaluation, educational goals fulfillment, instruction space and time. The effective factors of virtual education were as follows: the role of teacher, content and resources, educational materials, the role of family, growth and development, information technology, learning strategies, learning time, educational goals fulfillment, evaluation and learning space. On the other hand, the results showed that face-to-face and virtual teaching confirmed and emphasized the need for blended teaching. In other words, blended teaching
Metrics
References
Al Musawi, A. S., & Ammar, M. E. (2021). The Effect of Different Blending Levels of Traditional and E-Learning Delivery on Academic Achievement and Students' Attitudes towards Blended Learning at Sultan Qaboos University. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20(2), 127-139.
Conklin, S,.Trespalacios, J.,& Lowenthal, P.(2019). Graduate Students' Perceptions of Interactions in a Blended Synchronous Learning Environment: A Case Study. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 20(4), 45-59 https://doi.org/10.18122/B23M3W
Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.
AlNajdi, S. (2014, March). Hybrid learning in higher education. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 214-220). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Arya, P. P. (Ed.). (2006). Higher Education and Global Challenges: Systems and Opportunities. Deep and Deep Publications.
Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book: Best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. John Wiley & Sons.
Bonk C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer publishing
Bozkurt,A,.& Sharma,SH.(2021). In Pursuit of the Right Mix: Blended Learning for Augmenting, Enhancing, and Enriching Flexibility. Asian Journal of Distance Education,16(2),1-7
Cole,C.(2020). Blended Learning's Impact on Student Performance and Engagement in a Middle School Language Arts Classroom. Master's Theses, 1-37
Carman, J. M. (2005). Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. Agilant Learning, 1(11), 1-10.
Delialioglu, O.,& yildirim, Z. (2007). Student’s perception on effective dimensions of interactive learning in a blended learning environment. Journal of Education Technology & Society, 10(2),133-146
Derouin, R. E., Fritzsche, B. A., & Salas, E. (2005). E-learning in organizations. Journal of management, 31(6), 920-940. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279815
Donnelly, R. (2006). Blended problem-based learning for teacher education: lessons learnt. Journal of Learning, Media and Technology. 31(2), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880600756621
Viktorija , S., &Dušan , L.(2007). UP Faculty of management Koper, Blended learning and study effectiveness
Driscoll, M. (2010). Web-based training: Creating e-learning experiences. John Wiley & Sons.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Garrison, R. D., & Vaughan, N. D. (2007). Blended learning in higher education:Framework principles, and guidelines. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Graham, C. R. (2009). Blended learning models. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition (pp. 375-382). IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-026-4.ch063
Hwang, W.-Y., Hsu, J.-L., Tretiakov, A., Chou, H.-W., & Lee, C.-Y.(2009). Intra-action, Interaction and Outeraction in blended learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 222-239.
Mali, D., & Lim, H. (2021). How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic?. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100552 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552
Najar Ajampour, F(2017). The role of globalization in communication and culture. Mohageg ardebili publication.[Persian]
Overton, L. (2004). Linking learning to business. Bizmedia. Available: http://www. elearningage. co. uk.
Peyronnet, V., Sibiude, J., Deruelle, P., Huissoud, C., Lescure, X., Lucet, J. C., ... & Picone, O. (2020). Infection par le SARS-CoV-2 chez les femmes enceintes: état des connaissances et proposition de prise en charge par CNGOF. Gynécologie obstétrique fertilité & sénologie, 48(5), 436-443.
Pierce, D. (2017). What effective blended learning looks like. The Journal, 44(1), 18-20.
Rossett, A., & Frazee, R. V. (2006). Blended learning opportunities. AMA Real Estate: AMA Special Report, 1-27.
Safa, L & Shabanali, F.,& Hossein,A (2008). People-Process-Output Chain in Education Electronics: p3 electronic model, collection of articles of the first electronic learning conference, Zanjan University, 142-159
Sugrue, B. (2003). State of the industry: ASTD’s annual review of US and international trends in workplace learning and performance. Alexandria, VA: ASTD.
Talibzadeh, M.., & Hosseini,A, S.(2007). Distance Education: A New Approach in Iranian Education, A Study of the Effectiveness of Distance Learning Centers and Their Educational and Teaching Programs in the Secondary School of the 85-84 Academic Year of the whole country. Educational Innovation, 6 (1), 73-92. [Persian]
Yagcioglu,O.(2017). Increasing the power of humor and creativity in ELT class, Social and Emotional earning In EFLClasses, 5(9), 83-90
Yagcioglu,O.(2017).Blended learning higher education frame work, principal and quid lines. European journal of education studies, 3(5), 1-17
Yerasimou, T. (2010). Examining interactivity and flow in a blended course to advance blended learning practices (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University).
Yurniwati,Y.,& Yarmi,G.(2020). Promoting prospective teachers’ conceptual knowledge through web-based blended learning. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 187-201
Zenger.A., & Uehlei. C. (2001). Why blended will win. Journal of Training & development. 55(2), 54-59
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fatemeh Moradi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Diversitas Journal expresses that the articles are the sole responsibility of the Authors, who are familiar with Brazilian and international legislation.
Articles are peer-reviewed and care should be taken to warn of the possible incidence of plagiarism. However, plagiarism is an indisputable action by the authors.
The violation of copyright is a crime, provided for in article 184 of the Brazilian Penal Code: “Art. 184 Violating copyright and related rights: Penalty - detention, from 3 (three) months to 1 (one) year, or fine. § 1 If the violation consists of total or partial reproduction, for the purpose of direct or indirect profit, by any means or process, of intellectual work, interpretation, performance or phonogram, without the express authorization of the author, the performer, the producer , as the case may be, or whoever represents them: Penalty - imprisonment, from 2 (two) to 4 (four) years, and a fine. ”
.png){kind=logo}
