Special accommodation unveiled: the dynamics of fairness and effectiveness in admissions at Rizal Technological University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v10i3.3500Keywords:
Special Accommodation for Admission, University admissions, Fairness in admissions, Perceptions of fairness, Mixed-method approachAbstract
This study explores the dynamics of the Special Accommodation for Admission at Rizal Technological University, examining its distribution across colleges and institutes, perceived fairness, effectiveness, and overall impact on the admission process. Using a mixed-method embedded design, data collection combined quantitative surveys and qualitative responses. Quantitative analysis revealed variations in referral patterns, with mean scores and standard deviations calculated using Jamovi software to assess perceptions of fairness, adherence to guidelines, and effectiveness in selecting qualified candidates. Correlation analysis showed strong positive relationships between fairness and system effectiveness, as well as between fairness and impact on admission, suggesting that higher perceptions of fairness enhance both system efficiency and its perceived influence on admissions. A moderate correlation between system effectiveness and impact on admission indicates that while efficiency contributes to the process, transparency and equity also play crucial roles. Verbatim responses highlighted concerns about inconsistent policy application and the need for stricter adherence to the two-student limit per employee to improve fairness. While the system supports enrollment targets and class size management, challenges related to transparency, perceived equity, and academic qualifications persist. Respondents recommended refining the criteria, setting standardized academic qualifications, and conducting periodic reviews to align the system with the university’s strategic goals. This study contributes to understanding referral systems in higher education by emphasizing fairness and merit-based standards to foster institutional trust and uphold academic quality.
Metrics
References
Allanson, P. E., & Notar, C. E. (2020, September 3). Statistics as measurement: 4 Scales/Levels of measurement. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3685215
Banerjee, P. (2024). Connecting the dots: a systematic review of explanatory factors linking contextual indicators, institutional culture and degree awarding gaps. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 18(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/heed-07-2023-0020
Bentalha, B., & Alla, L. (2024). Revealing the subtleties. In Advances in library and information science (ALIS) book series (pp. 1–21). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5543-5.ch001
Burkart, N., & Huber, M. F. (2021). A survey on the explainability of supervised machine learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70, 245–317. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12228
Chen, Y. (2024). Essays on admissions to higher education and juvenile criminal justice. - ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/0e895529910ab79c90c5f0b031afd090/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Davis, S. J. (2021). Minority adolescents and school referral: The importance of school counselors and the referral system. Doctoral Dissertations and Projects, 3116. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/3116
Desveaux, L., Ivers, N. M., Devotta, K., Ramji, N., Weyman, K., & Kiran, T. (2021). Unpacking the intention to action gap: A qualitative study understanding how physicians engage with audit and feedback. Implementation Science, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01088-1
Ennover, T. M. (2024). The influence of culturally relevant practices on early career teachers: The referral of students of color for special education. - ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/171d7d6fe1033ba8140e4854b7cb4802/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Gao, F., & Adamson, B. (2022). Exploring the role of community cultural wealth in university access for minority students. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(6), 916–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2074374
Halabieh, H., Hawkins, S., Bernstein, A. E., Lewkowict, S., Kamel, B. U., Fleming, L., & Levitin, D. (2022). The future of higher education: Identifying current educational problems and proposed solutions. Education Sciences, 12(12), 888. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120888
Lazarus, J. V., Ratzan, S., Palayew, A., Billari, F. C., Binagwaho, A., Kimball, S., Larson, H. J., Melegaro, A., Rabin, K., White, T. M., & El-Mohandes, A. (2020). COVID-SCORE: A global survey to assess public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 (COVID-SCORE-10). PLoS ONE, 15(10), e0240011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240011
Mainga, W., Murphy-Braynen, M. B., Moxey, R., & Quddus, S. A. (2022). Graduate employability of business students. Administrative Sciences, 12(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030072
Moltudal, S. (2021, June 24). Purposeful actions in leadership of learning processes: A mixed methods study of classroom management in digital learning environments. https://bora.uib.no/bora-xmlui/handle/11250/2759572
Morris, S. R. (n.d.). The effects of grading equity practices on students: Do student perceptions of and teachers’ exposure to grading equity practices matter? - ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/ffe879ad430ee421443665135c0217c7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Muraleedharan, A., Ragavan, S., Bage, N. N., & Devi, R. (2022). Perceptions of medical undergraduate students on curricular changes in anatomy: An embedded design mixed method study. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals), 10(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2021.92149.1472
Pascua, B. L. E. (2023). Creating systemic support: Cross-sector partnerships as a catalyst to institutional transformation for Southeast Asian student support. USF Scholarship: A Digital Repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/1612/
Shoshan, H. N., & Wehrt, W. (2021). Understanding “Zoom fatigue”: A mixed-method approach. Applied Psychology, 71(3), 827–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12360
Starck, J. G., Sinclair, S., & Shelton, J. N. (2021). How university diversity rationales inform student preferences and outcomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(16). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2013833118
Tanaka, T., Kato, N., Yokoya, S., Ono, A., Isojima, T., Yokomichi, H., Yamagata, Z., Tanaka, S., Matsubara, H., Ishikuro, M., Kikuya, M., Chida, S., Hosoya, M., Kuriyama, S., & Kure, S. (2020). Changes in height standard deviation scores during early life are affected by nutrition. Pediatrics International, 63(6), 710–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.14577
Wilson, M. (2023). Constructing measures. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003286929
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ma. Eugenia YANGCO, Kristine Opulencia, Samuel Balbin, Faith Micah Abenes-Balbin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Diversitas Journal expresses that the articles are the sole responsibility of the Authors, who are familiar with Brazilian and international legislation.
Articles are peer-reviewed and care should be taken to warn of the possible incidence of plagiarism. However, plagiarism is an indisputable action by the authors.
The violation of copyright is a crime, provided for in article 184 of the Brazilian Penal Code: “Art. 184 Violating copyright and related rights: Penalty - detention, from 3 (three) months to 1 (one) year, or fine. § 1 If the violation consists of total or partial reproduction, for the purpose of direct or indirect profit, by any means or process, of intellectual work, interpretation, performance or phonogram, without the express authorization of the author, the performer, the producer , as the case may be, or whoever represents them: Penalty - imprisonment, from 2 (two) to 4 (four) years, and a fine. ”
