Reflections on teaching ratio and proportion using Lesson Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i1_Special.2834Palabras clave:
higher-order thinking skills, lesson study, ratio and proportion, reflection, onlineResumen
Lesson Study brinda una oportunidad para que los maestros participen en capas de reflexiones individuales y colaborativas en, sobre y para practicar para mejorar el proceso de enseñanza y aprendizaje. Este artículo informa sobre reflexiones sobre la proporción y proporción de la enseñanza en línea utilizando Lesson Study, que podrían mejorar el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje, específicamente en pedagogía. El estudio constó de tres etapas principales: planificación de la lección, estudio de la lección propiamente dicho y reflexión a través de la discusión posterior a la lección. En el estudio de la lección de investigación propiamente dicha participaron estudiantes de noveno grado en una escuela de Filipinas y seis profesores: uno impartió la lección y los otros cinco observaron la clase a través de Zoom. Además, los seis profesores participaron en la discusión posterior a la lección. Los datos recopilados en este estudio cualitativo descriptivo fueron analizados mediante análisis temático. Se concluyó que en la enseñanza de la razón y proporción se debe enfatizar la distinción entre terminologías para que no haya confusión y que los estudiantes utilicen lo adecuado.
Además, se recomienda incluir en la lección un problema de la vida real que involucre razones y proporciones para que los estudiantes aprecien sus usos y reduzcan su abstracción. Los profesores también deben ir más allá de las actividades rutinarias para aumentar el pensamiento crítico de los estudiantes y emplear las habilidades de pensamiento de orden superior. Por lo tanto, se recomienda que los docentes se capaciten para aprender diferentes y nuevas pedagogías para mejorar su enseñanza yendo más allá de las actividades rutinarias e incorporando problemas de la vida real.
Métricas
Citas
Abdullah, A. H., Mokhtar, M., Abd Halim, N. D., Ali, D. F., Tahir, L. M., & Kohar, U. H. A. (2016). Mathematics teachers’ level of knowledge and practice on the implementation of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 3-17.
Alam, S. (2016). Teachers, collaboration, praxis: A case study of a participatory action research project in a rural school of Bangladesh. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/11856
Andini, W., & Jupri, A. (2017). Student Obstacles in Ratio and Proportion Learning. Journal of Physics. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012048
Baig, F. (2015). Application of Teaching Methods in Mathematics at Secondary Level in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292608579_Application_ of_Teaching_Methods_in_Mathematics_at_Secondary_Level_in_Pakistan
Bailin, S. & Siegel, H.(2002). Critical Thinking. Blackwell Publishers Ltd. https://philpapers.org/rec/BAICT-2
Bonotto, C. (2013). Artifacts as sources for problem-posing activities. Educational studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 37-55.
Boudreaux, A., Kanim, S. & Brahmia, S. (2015). Student facility with ratio and proportion: Mapping the reasoning space in introductory physics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.08960. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511.08960
Cadorna, E.A., Garnace, J.B., Molina, J.T., Domondon, C.S., and Galangco, J.E., (2023). Development Of Technostress Scale For Filipino Students Using Exploratory And Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Journal of Namibian Studies. Vol. 33. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.3223. Retrieved from https://namibian-studies.com/index.php/JNS/article/view/3223
Çalışıcı, H. (2018). Middle School Students' Learning Difficulties in the Ratio-proportion Topic and a Suggested Solution: Envelope Technique. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(8): 1848-1855. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060830
Caulfield, J. (2019). How to Do Thematic Analysis. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/thematic-analysis/
Chi, C. (2023, December 6). Philippines still lags behind world in math, reading and science — PISA 2022. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/12/06/2316732/philippines-still-lags-behind-world-math-reading-and-science-pisa-2022
Clements, D.& Sarama, J. (2016). Math, Science, and Technology in the Early Grades. Future of Children.
Colomer, J., Serra, T., Cañabate, D., & Bubnys, R. (2020). Reflective learning in higher education: Active methodologies for transformative practices. Sustainability, 12(9), 3827.
Davison, C. (2006). Collaboration Between ESL and Content Teachers: How Do We Know When We Are Doing It Right?. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 454-475. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb339.0
Debreli, E. (2011). The effect of creative drama based instruction on seventh grade students’ achievement in ratio and proportion concepts and attitudes toward mathematics [M.S. - Master of Science]. Middle East Technical University.
DepEd Order No. 012, S. 2020. (2020, June 19). Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020-2021 in light of the COViD-19 Public Health Emergency. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020/06/19/june-19-2020-do-012-2020-adoption-of-the-basic-education-learning-continuity-plan-for-school-year-2020-2021-in-the-light-of-the-covid-19-public-health-emergency/
Domondon, C.S., Pardo, C.G. & Rin, E.T. (2022). Analysis of Difficulties of Students in Learning Calculus. Science International (Lahore), 34(6),1-4. http://www.sci-int.com/pdf/638066898447788849.pdf
Dougherty, B., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., & Shin, M. (2017). Helping Students With Mathematics Difficulties Understand Ratios and Proportions. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(2), 96-105. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1129390.pdf
Elipane, L. (2012). Integrating the essential elements of lesson study in pre-service mathematics Teacher Education. Department of Science Education, Copenhagen University, Denmark. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323856354_Integrating_the_ Essential_Elements_of_Lesson_Study_in_Pre-service_Mathematics_Teacher_Education
Elipane, L. (2017). Introducing Lesson Study as a Professional Development Model in the Islands of the Philippines. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 1126-1129.
Erdogan, A., & Sahin, I. (2010) Relationship between math teacher candidates’ Technological Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2707-2711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.400
Fernandez, C., & Chokshi, S. (2002). A Practical Guide to Translating Lesson Study for a U.S. Setting. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(2), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208400208
Firdaus, F. M., & Herman, T. (2017). Improving Primary Students' Mathematical Literacy through Problem Based Learning and Direct Instruction. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(4), 212-219.
Fisher, A. (2001). Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press
Friesen, N., & Osguthorpe, R. (2017). Tact and the pedagogical triangle: The authenticity of teachers in relation. Teaching and Teacher Education. 70. 10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.023.
Heiman, M., & Slomianko, J. (1987). Thinking Skills Instruction: Concepts and Techniques. NEA Professional Library
Jitendra, A. K., Star, J. R., Starosta, K., Leh, J. M., Sood, S., Caskie, G., Hughes, C. L., & Mack, T. R. (2009). Improving seventh grade students’ learning of ratio and proportion: The role of schema-based instruction, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.001.
Lele, S. R., Merrill, E. H., Keim, J., & Boyce, M. S. (2013). Selection, use, choice and occupancy: clarifying concepts in resource selection studies. Journal of Animal Ecology, 82(6), 1183-1191.
Lewis, C. (2002). Does Lesson Study Have a Future in the United States? Nagoya Journal of Education and Human Development, 1, 1-23.
Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. R., Friedkin, S., & Roth, J. R. (2012). Improving Teaching Does Improve Teachers: Evidence from Lesson Study. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112446633
Maccini, P., Strickland, T., Gagnon, J. C., & Malmgren, K. (2017). Accessing the General Education Math Curriculum for Secondary Students With High-Incidence Disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 40(8). https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v40i8.6833
Makinae, N. (2010). The Origin of Lesson Study in Japan. The 5th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education: In Search of Excellence in Mathematics Education, 15, Tokyo.
Manmai, T. O., Inprasitha, M., & Changsri, N. (2021). Cognitive Aspects of Students' Mathematical Reasoning Habits: A Study on Utilizing Lesson Study and Open Approach. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 29(4).
Mason, M. (2007), Critical Thinking and Learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39, 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00343.x
Mena Marcos, J. J., Sánchez Miguel, E., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Teacher reflection on action: What is said (in research) and what is done (in teaching). Reflective Practice, 10(2), 191-204.
Ngiwas, F., Mariano, D., Barsana, J., Cruz, M., Elipane, L. (2022). Example–conclusion map in teaching simple interest: A lesson study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) 11(1), 377-384. doi:10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21560
Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics Literacy: are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use. Journal Of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89-100.
Perry, R. & Lewis, C. (2008). What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US?. Journal of Educational Change. 10. 365-391. 10.1007/s10833-008-9069-7.
Pratama, G. S., & Retnawati, H. (2018). Urgency of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) content analysis in mathematics textbook. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1), 012147.
Rabanal, G.C., & Domondon, C.S. (2023). Learning Experiences of Students in a General Education Course in Mathematics. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 14(1). 42-49. https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.14.01.004
Rock, T. C., & Wilson, C. (2005). Improving Teaching through Lesson Study. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32, 77-92.
Roldán, S., Barreda, D., Granda, M., Menéndez, R., Santamaría, R., & Blanco, C. (2015). An approach to classification and capacitance expressions in electrochemical capacitors technology. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 17(2), 1084-1092.
Rowland, T. (2013). The Knowledge Quartet: the genesis and application of a framework for analysing mathematics teaching and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge. Sisyphus—Journal of Education, 1(3), 154-43.
San Juan, R. (2019, December 4). DepEd welcomes PISA results, recognizes 'gaps' in education quality. Philstar Global. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2019/12/04/1974229/depedwelcomes-pisa- resultsrecognizesgapseducationquality#:~:text=The%20Philippines%20also%20 placed%20the,scored%20lower%20in%20these%20categories.
Schön, D. A. (1992). The theory of inquiry: Dewey’s legacy to education. Curriculum Inquiry, 22, 119–139.
Snidaro, L., Garcia-Herrera, J., Llinas, J., & Blasch, E. (2016). Context-enhanced information fusion. Boosting Real-World Performance with Domain Knowledge. Springer.
Sumantri, M. S., Prayuningtyas, A. W., Rachmadtullah, R., & Magdalena, I. (2018). The Roles of Teacher-Training Programs and Student Teachers’ Self-Regulation in Developing Competence in Teaching Science. Advanced Science Letters, 24(10), 7077-7081.
Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students' mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307-315.
Thorsen, C.A. & DeVore, S. (2013). Analyzing reflection on/for action: A new approach. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 14(1), 88 - 103
Xu, C., Lafay, A., Douglas , H., Burr, S. D. L., LeFevre, J-A., Osana, H., Skwarchuk, S-L., Wylie, J., Simms, V., & Maloney, E. (2022). The role of mathematical language skills in arithmetic fluency and word-problem solving for first- and second-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 513-539. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000673
Zulfikar, T., & Mujiburrahman. (2018). Understanding own teaching: becoming reflective teachers through reflective journals. Reflective Practice, 19(1), 1-13.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Christian Domondon, Mark Joseph Corpuz, Mark Carranza, Imriani Moroki, Ferdie Ching, Levi Elipane
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
O periodico Diversitas Journal expressa que os artigos são de unica responsabilidade dos Autores, conhecedores da legislação Brasileira e internacional. Os artigos são revisados pelos pares e devem ter o cuidado de avisar da possível incidencia de plagiarismo. Contudo o plagio é uma ação incontestavel dos autores. A Diversitas Journal não publicará artigos com indicios de Plagiarismos. Artigos com plagios serão tratados em conformidade com os procedimentos de plagiarismo COPE.
A violação dos direitos autorais constitui crime, previsto no artigo 184, do Código Penal Brasileiro:
“Art. 184 Violar direitos de autor e os que lhe são conexos: Pena – detenção, de 3 (três) meses a 1 (um) ano, ou multa. § 1o Se a violação consistir em reprodução total ou parcial, com intuito de lucro direto ou indireto, por qualquer meio ou processo, de obra intelectual, interpretação, execução ou fonograma, sem autorização expressa do autor, do artista intérprete ou executante, do produtor, conforme o caso, ou de quem os represente: Pena – reclusão, de 2 (dois) a 4 (quatro) anos, e multa.”
.png){kind=logo}
