Unveiling Excellence
A Holistic Evaluation of the Summer Enrichment Program at Laboratory Elementary School, DMMMSU-MLUC, Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i1.2890Palabras clave:
Academic Proficiency, Educational Intervention, Elementary Summer Program, Summer Enrichment ProgramResumen
In strict accordance with DepEd Order No. 23, Series of 2011, the Laboratory Elementary School at DMMMSU-MLUC instituted the Summer Enrichment Program (SEP). This comprehensive study meticulously explores the evaluation of SEP's effectiveness while identifying areas ripe for improvement, centering on enrollment dynamics, completion rates, tutor engagement, and overall program execution. Employing a robust descriptive-evaluative research design, the analytical framework spans the critical examination of documents, survey analyses, and in-depth interviews with pertinent stakeholders. Positive trends, notably a marked increase in enrollment and heightened academic proficiency serve as tangible indicators of the SEP's unequivocal positive impact. Although the program's implementation broadly aligns with regulatory frameworks, targeted domains such as Admission, Program Offerings, and Facilities warrant nuanced scrutiny to optimize outcomes. This research stands as an invaluable resource for educational institutions seeking to refine and elevate enrichment programs, contributing significantly to the scholarly dialogue surrounding effective educational interventions and fostering a more holistic educational experience for young learners.
Métricas
Citas
American English (2022). Teacher’s Corner: Making Learning Fun. Teacher's Corner: Making Learning Fun | American English(state.gov). Department of Education (2019). PISA 2018 National Report of the Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PISA-2018-Philippine-National-Report.pdf
Department of Education (2011). DepEd Order No. 23, Series of 2011 or the Elementary Summer Program (ESP): A Strategy to Reach More Children. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2011/03/28/deped-to-implement-kindergarten-summer-program/
Dietrich, J. et al. (2021). Does an individualized learning design improve university student online learning? A randomized field experiments. Computers in Human Behavior. Volume 122, 2021,106819, ISSN 0747-5632,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106819.(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563221001424).
Fredman, R. (2017). Uncovering The Lived Experience Of CommunityDwelling Jewish Women Over 80 Who SelfIdentify As Aging Successfully: A Phenomenological Study. University of Vermont. ). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 680. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/680
Garcia, S. (2022). Tailored summer programs for academically gifted students. American Education Review, 78(2), 67-81.Groenewald, T. (2004). A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1-26.
Hidayati, L., & Zulher, Z. (2022). The The Effect of Leadership and Compensation on Employee Performance with Motivation as Moderating Variables at the Pangeran Hotel Pekanbaru. IJEBD (International Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Business Development), 5(1), 82-91.
Jones, A. (2021). Instructional interventions: Essential components. Educational Journal, 45(3), 112-126.
Karst, K., et al. (2022). Data-based differentiated instruction: The impact of standardized assessment and aligned teaching material on students’ reading comprehension, Learning and Instruction. Volume 79, 2022, 101597, ISSN 0959-4752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101597.(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475222000184)
Lee, A (2019). Instructional Intervention: What You Need to Know. https://www.understood.org/en/learning-attention-issues/treatments-approaches/educational-strategies/instructional-intervention-what-you-need-to-know
Mathnasium (2019). 5 Reasons Why Math Summer Enrichment Benefits Your Child. https://www.mathnasium.com/highlandsranch/news/math-summer-enrichment-benefits
McEachin, A., Augustine, C.H. and Mccombs, J. (2018). Effective Summer Programing. Effective Summer Programming: What Educators and Policymakers Should Know, By Andrew McEachin, Catherine H. Augustine, and Jennifer McCombs, American Educator, Vol. 42, No. 1, Spring 2018, AFT.
McLane, K., (2022). Student Progress Monitoring: What This Means for Your Child. https://www.readingrockets.org/article/student-progress-monitoring-what-means-your-child
Munna, A.S. and Kalam, Md. A., (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: a literature review. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED610428.pdf
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2019). Evaluation: A systematic approach (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.Smith, J. (2022). Summer enrichment programs: Categorization and impact. Educational Perspectives,59(4), 223-235.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2020). CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist. Western Michigan University.
Wallace Foundation (2019). Making summer count: How summer programs can boost children's learning. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/summer-and-extended-learning-time/summer-learning/Documents/Making-Summer-Count-How-Summer-Programs-Can-Boost-Childrens-Learning.pdf
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Oscar Jr Ancheta
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
O periodico Diversitas Journal expressa que os artigos são de unica responsabilidade dos Autores, conhecedores da legislação Brasileira e internacional. Os artigos são revisados pelos pares e devem ter o cuidado de avisar da possível incidencia de plagiarismo. Contudo o plagio é uma ação incontestavel dos autores. A Diversitas Journal não publicará artigos com indicios de Plagiarismos. Artigos com plagios serão tratados em conformidade com os procedimentos de plagiarismo COPE.
A violação dos direitos autorais constitui crime, previsto no artigo 184, do Código Penal Brasileiro:
“Art. 184 Violar direitos de autor e os que lhe são conexos: Pena – detenção, de 3 (três) meses a 1 (um) ano, ou multa. § 1o Se a violação consistir em reprodução total ou parcial, com intuito de lucro direto ou indireto, por qualquer meio ou processo, de obra intelectual, interpretação, execução ou fonograma, sem autorização expressa do autor, do artista intérprete ou executante, do produtor, conforme o caso, ou de quem os represente: Pena – reclusão, de 2 (dois) a 4 (quatro) anos, e multa.”