Teachers’ Information and Communication Technology Competence: Basis for the Development of Technology Guide for Teaching and Learning

Alvin Mahawan; Melinda De Guzman

doi:10.48017/dj.v10i1.3259

Autores

Alvin Mahawan Dr. Emilio B. Espinosa Sr. Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology. Masbate City, Bicol Region, Philippines https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6228-238X
Melinda De Guzman Bicol University-Open University. Legazpi City, Bicol Region, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v10i1.3259

Palavras-chave:

Competência em TIC, desenvolvimento de guias tecnológicos, ensino e aprendizagem

Resumo

Este estudo investiga os níveis de competência em tecnologia da informação e comunicação (TIC) dos professores em seis dimensões: alfabetização em informação e dados, comunicação e colaboração, criação de conteúdo digital, segurança e proteção, resolução de problemas e análise e reflexão. Um design descritivo-desenvolvimentista foi usado e os dados foram tratados usando porcentagens, média ponderada e técnicas de porcentagem cumulativa. O estudo inclui sessenta e quatro (64) professores de ensino fundamental e superior na província de Masbate. As descobertas revelam que os professores são competentes em geral, com pontos fortes em navegação básica, pesquisa e filtragem de dados, mas fraquezas na avaliação e gerenciamento de informações e envolvimento em práticas colaborativas online. Embora os professores demonstrem competência na produção de conteúdo digital e compreensão de direitos autorais, eles precisam de ajuda com formatação avançada e processamento de conteúdo complexo. A segurança e a proteção mostraram atenção significativa, mas as deficiências persistem no design de recursos de aprendizagem adequados e na resolução de problemas com ferramentas de TIC. Um Guia de Tecnologia para Ensino e Aprendizagem (TGTL) é desenvolvido para abordar essas lacunas, compreendendo seis módulos alinhados com indicadores de competência em TIC. Os professores aceitam muito o TGTL, reconhecendo seu potencial para aprimorar a competência em todas as dimensões. As recomendações para implementação incluem treinamento baseado em escola e re-echo, desenvolvimento profissional contínuo e revisitação de despesas de manutenção e operação para workshops especializados. As conclusões ressaltam a importância de abordagens integradas para o desenvolvimento de competências em TIC, particularmente em áreas de fraqueza, como resolução de problemas e colaboração. O TGTL demonstra o potencial para melhorar a competência do professor e pode ser replicado para implementação mais ampla em ambientes de ensino primário e superior. Este estudo contribui para o esforço contínuo de equipar educadores com as habilidades necessárias para ensino e aprendizagem digitais eficazes.

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...

Biografia do Autor

Alvin Mahawan, Dr. Emilio B. Espinosa Sr. Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology. Masbate City, Bicol Region, Philippines

0000-0001-6228-238X; Dr. Emilio B. Espinosa Sr. Memorial State College of Agriculture and Technology. Masbate City, Bicol Region, Philippines. ammahawan@debesmscat.edu.ph

Melinda De Guzman, Bicol University-Open University. Legazpi City, Bicol Region, Philippines

0009-0006-7493-0544; Bicol University-Open University. Legazpi City, Bicol Region, Philippines. mddeguzman@bicol-u.edu.ph

Referências

Albion, P. R., Tondeur, J., Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Peeraer, J. (2015). Teachers' professional development for ICT integration: Towards a reciprocal relationship between research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 655-673.

Aldoobie N 2015. ADDIE model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6) : 68-71.

Al Khateeb, A. A. M. (2017). Measuring digital competence and ICT literacy: An exploratory study of In-Service English Language teachers in the context of Saudi Arabia. International Education Studies, 10(12), 38-51.

Amhag, L., Hellstrom, L., & Stigmar, M. (2019). Teacher educators’ use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Antonio, A., Probitchado, R. Jr., Ricohermoso, C., Saavedra, A., & De La Rama, J.M., (2020). Gender differences in technological competence among science teachers: Implications. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 13257-13268

ASQ, (2022). What is problem solving, https://asq.org/what-is-problem-solving

Azuelo, A., Sariana, L., & Manual, A. (2015). Science teachers’ teaching competencies and their training experience in classroom pedagogical approaches. Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research, 11(1), 1-14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7828/ljher.v11i1.886

Barbour, M. K. (2018). A history of K-12 distance, online, and blended learning worldwide. Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning, 21-40.

Belay, M., Khatete, D., & Mugo, B. (2020). Teachers’ attitude towards integrating ICT in classroom instruction in teaching and learning biology in secondary schools in the Southern Region, Eritrea. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(1) 5, 1-18.

Bertea, P. 2009. Measurıng students’ attıtude towards elearnıng. A case study. ELearning and Software for Education, 1(1): 417–424.

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage

Butrime, E. (2020). Virtual learning environment and learning change in modern higher education during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic: Attitudes of University teachers and students. 9th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347245965

Byres, E., & Cusimano, J. (2010). Safety and security: Two sides of the same coin. Chemical Processing, March, 18-19.

Calderon, J. (2006). Methods of Research and Thesis Writing (2nd Ed.). Mandaluyong City: National Bookstore.

In Rillo, R. & Alieto, E. (2018). Indirectness markers in Korean and Persian English essays: Implications for teaching writing to EFL learners. English as an International Journal,13(2.2), 165-184.

Caluza, L. J. B., Verecio, R. L., Funcion, D. G. D., Quisumbing, L. A., Gotardo, M. A., Laurente, M. L. P., ... & Marmita, V. (2017). An assessment of ICT competencies of public school teachers: Basis for community extension program. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(3), 1-13.

Cambridge Dictionary, (n.d.). Acceptability. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/acceptability

Cano-García, F., & García-Martínez, I. (2017). Integrative learning and teacher training: A systematic review of research on an emerging field of study. Educational Research Review, 22, 181-201.

Caraig, G. A., Iyo Jr, G. E., Kelechi, E. S., Caraig, M. E., Caraig, G. A., Iyo, G. N., ... & Caraig, M. E. (2020). Integration of e-learning system through mobile technology. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 5(1), 459-474.

Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigCom 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens, With eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, doi:10.2760/38842

Castro, J., Lombrio, C., & Viojan, R. (2019). Level of ICT competence in classroom instruction: Its influence on ENSCIMATH teaching. Institutional Faculty Research, papers.ssrn.com

Chen, L. (2017). Digital storytelling as an innovative pedagogical tool: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 10(1), 1-14.

Commission on Higher Education (2021). Guidelines on the Implementation of Limited Face-to-Face Classes for all Programs of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Areas Under Alert Level System for COVID-19 Response, No. 2021-004. Retrieved from https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/CHED-DOH-JMC-No.-2021-004.pdf

Daling, R. (2017). Secondary school teachers’ competency in information and communication technology. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(11), 117-122.

Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.

De la Rama, J.M., Sabales, M., Antonio, A. Ricohermoso, C., Torres, J., Devanadera, A., Tulio, C., & Alieto, E. (2020). Virtual teaching as the new norm: Analyzing science teachers’ attitude toward online teaching, technological competence and access. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 12705-12715

Degerli, A., Aytekin, C., & Degerli, B. (2015). Analyzing information technology status and networked readiness index in context of diffusion of innovations theory. Procedia-Social and Chenavioral Sciences, 195, 1553-1562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.190

Dela Fuente, J. & Biñas, L (2020). Teachers’ competence in information and communications technology (ICT) as educational tool in teaching: An empirical analysis for program intervention. Journal of Research in Education, Science and Technology, 5(2), 61-76

Djumaeva, G.A. (2021). Analysis of the attitude of teachers and students to the distance learning format. International Journal of Innovative Analyses and Emerging Technology, 1(5), 1-3

Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively?. Computers & Education, 51(1), 187-199.

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

Estremera, M. I. 2017. “Acceptability and Quality Level of the Developed Reading Module Entitled ‘Lead to Learn, Save the World’: An Instructional Material Used for SY 2014-2015 to SY 2015-2016.” Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics, 40, 31-7.

European Commission. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcomp/digital-competence-framework

Fidalgo, P., J. Thormann, O. Kulyk, and J. A. Lencastre. 2020. Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1): 18. doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2.

Frey, Bruce. (2018). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. 10.4135/9781506326139.

Gavino-Gumba, B. (2010). Economic and social dimensions of rural poverty in the poorest Province of the Philippines. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(6).

Gay, L. (1976). Educational research: competencies for analysis and application. The University of Michigan:

Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., & Yildirim, Z. (2009). Main barriers and possible enablers of ICT integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 193-204.

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education, (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). New York: Routledge.

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Mayorga-Fernández, M. J. (2020). Identification of variables that predict teachers’ attitudes toward ICT in higher education for teaching and research: A study with regression. Sustainability, 12(4), 1312.

Hai, T. T., Thao, T. T. P., & Tinh, T. T. (2016). Assess ICT competences in teaching of teachers and trainee teachers at highland North Vietnam. Education, 54, 27-98.

Halverson, R. (2009). Digital storytelling in and out of school. Educational Technology, 49(3), 27-32.

Hatlevik, O.E. (2017) Examining the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy, their digital competence, strategies to evaluate information, and use of ICT at school, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 555-567, DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2016.1172501

Hero, J. L., Zulueta, M. C. E., Gloria D. S., Tongol, J. C. L., Cruz, A. C. D., Sagun, S, A, T., Cajurao, F. G. V., & Cabrera, W. C. (2021). Mastering innovations in the lens of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) competence and practices of 21st century Filipino teachers: A comparison among Thailand, Vietnam, and the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(4): 285 – 295. DOI: 10.11594/ijmaber.02.04.02

Hwa, A.P. (2016). Briefing on ICT competency standards. United Nations APCICT-ESCAP, https://www.unapcict.org/sites/default/files/2018-12/Briefing%20on%20ICT%20Competency%20Standards_FINAL.pdf

Ivaniuk, I & Ovcharuk, O. (2020). The response of Ukranian teachers to COVID-19: Challenges and needs in the use of digital tools for distance learning. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 77(3), 282-291. DOI: 10.33407/itlt.v77i3.3952

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. 1999. Yeni İnsan ve İnsanlar (10. Baskı). Evrim Yayınları.

Kharade, K. & Thakkar, R. (2012). Promoting ICT enhanced constructivist teaching practices among pre-service teachers: A case study. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 2(1), 45-51, http://www.ijsrp.org/ejournal.html

Kim, Y. (2018). The framework of cloud e-learning system for strengthening ICT competence of teachers in Nicaragua. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering Informational Technology, 8(1), 62-67.

Kim, C., & Kim, M. K. (2017). The effects of digital storytelling on students' creative thinking. Education Sciences, 7(4), 88.

Knezek & Christensen, (2016) Knezek, G., Christensen, R. Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: adding pedagogy as a new model construct. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28, 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9120-2

Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., & Bozkurt, A. (2019). Digital storytelling as a multicultural learning tool: Empowering global citizens through eTwinning projects. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-18.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?. Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. doi:10.1177/002205741319300303

Lee, J. H., & Lim, C. P. (2018). An investigation of the impact of integrative learning on teacher creativity and collaboration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(6), 830-849.

Markova, T., Glazkova, I., & Zaborova, E. (2016). Quality issues of online distance learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237(2017), 685-691. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.043

Roselle, J., Abellon., Genelyn, R., Fariñas., Ana, Beatriz, D., Soriano., Thelma, E., Rodriguez., Felipe, E., Balaria. (2020). Utilization of Maintenance and other Operating Expenses (MOOE) of Non-Fiscally Autonomous Senior High Schools towards Achieving their Annual Improvement Plan (AIP). International Journal of Advanced engineering, Management and Science, doi: 10.22161/IJAEMS.67.1

Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158

Miguel, F., Robledo, D.A., & Lapada, A. (2020). Teachers’ Covid-19 awareness, distance learning education experience and perceptions towards institutional readiness and challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.8

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Munna, A. & Kalam, Md A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: A literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation, 4(1), 1-4. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED610428.pdf

Murithi, J., & Yoo, J. E. (2021). Teachers’ use of ICT in implementing the competency-based curriculum in Kenyan public primary schools. Innovation and Education, 3(1), 1-11.

Muslim, A., Yusuf. Y., & Juliana, R. (2018). Perceptions and barriers to ICT use among English teachers in Indonesia. The Journal of Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 3-23. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=606504

Naila,, Zarina, Waheed,, Ruqia, Mirwan. (2022). Continuous professional development and its impacts on teachers’ pedagogy. Pakistan journal of educational research, doi: 10.52337/pjer.v5i2.528

Nancy, Grover. (2022). Change in the professional environment of in-service teachers after attending training programmes. International Journal of Advanced Research, doi: 10.21474/ijar01/15631

Nativization of English in the Philippines as Seen in a Local Daily - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Map-of-the-Philippines-and-Masbate_fig1_303015642 [accessed 20 Feb, 2023]

Ni, A. Y. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education,19(2), 199–215.

Niess, M. L. (2016). Digital technology and teacher preparation: The science teacher education partnership. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 487-498.

Obana, J. (2020, March 18). Could educational technology be a „holy grail‟ amid Covid-19 crisis? The Manila Times. Retrieved from https://www.manilatimes.net/2020/03/18/business/

Omar, N. D., Hassan, H., & Atan, H. (2012). Student engagement in online learning: learners attitude toward e-mentoring. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 464 – 475.

Oxford Learner’s Dictionary, (n.d.). Profile retrieved from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/profile_1

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J.(2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.

Petko, D., Prasse, D., & Cantieni, A. (2018). The interplay of school readiness and teacher readiness for educational technology integration: A structural equation model. Computers in the Schools: Interdisciplinary Journal of Practice, Theory, and Applied Research, 35(1), 1-18, DOI: 10.1080/07380569.2018.1428007

Prensky, M. (2008). The 21st-century digital native: Myth and reality. On the Horizon, 16(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120810877668

Rubach, C., & Lazarides, R. (2021). Addressing 21st-century digital skills in schools–Development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers' basic ICT competence beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1007/s35834-019-00248-0

Semerci, A., & Aydin, M.K. (2018). Examining high school teachers’ attitudes towards ICT use in education. International Journal on Progressive Education, 14(2), 93–105. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1177301

Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., & Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre-and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106552.

Severy, L. J. 1974. Prosedures and issues in the measurement of attitudes

Sharma, A., & Naidu, V. R. (2020). A Study on emerging trends to enhance learning experience in higher education institutions. INTED2020 Proceedings, 1, 7391-7396.

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.

Singh, R. (2013). Collaboration in the cloud: Role of attraction and online collaborative tools in enhancing knowledge creation in virtual environments. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 12(04), 1350030-1350031; 1350030-1350112.

Sitzmann, T., Kraiger, K., Stewart, D., & Wisher, R. (2010). The comparative effectiveness of web‐based and classroom instruction: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63(4), 623-664.

Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, new schools. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.

Stiggins, R. J., Arter, J. A., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2012). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right--using it well. Pearson.

Suleiman, I. I., & Arora, P. (2017). Using digital technologies in problem-based learning: A case study of preservice teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(8), 1061-1082.

Taylor, L. K. (2018). Digital citizenship education in teacher education: A call for programmatic reconceptualization. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(2), 97-104.

Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs, H., & Curcher, M. (2020). Post-Covid-19 education and education technology ‘solutionism’: A seller’s market. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 863-878.

Terrano, H.J. (2018). Development and effectiveness of a textbook on advanced mathematics for engineering programs. International Journal of Education Sciences, 23(1-3), 717. DOI: 10.31901/24566322.2018/23.1-3.1069

Thurstone, L. L. 1931. The measurement of social attitudes. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26(3), 249–269. doi:10.1037/h0070363.

Tosun, Ö. Ç., & Top, E. (2019). Preservice teachers' perceptions and needs regarding digital citizenship education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(5), 710-734.

Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). Collaborative project-based learning with social media: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 31-42.

UNESCO (2017). Celebrating Higher Education Teaching Personnel. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/news/celebrating-higher-education-teaching-personnel#:~:text=The%20Recommendation%20defines%20higher%2Deducation,community%20at%20large.%E2%80%9D%20Mr.

UNESCO, (2018). UNESCO ICT competency framework, version 3. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization http://en.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en

Ventayen, R.J. (2018). Teachers’ readiness in online teaching environment: A case of Department of Education teachers, Journal of Education, Management and Social Sciences, 2(1), 94-106.

Waters, J. K. (2015). Engaging students in global issues: Multimedia, storytelling, and social networking. Journal of Geography, 114(5), 192-201.

Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A Review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235–286.

Weebly.com. 2020. “Research Assignments - Slovin’s Formula.” Prudence https://prudencexd.weebly.com/index.html.

Wells, K (2017). Collaboration vs. Communication: Why The Difference Matters. Field Service Digital. Retrieved from https://fsd.servicemax.com/2017/11/29/collaboration-vs-communication-the-difference-matters/

Wenrui, Zhu. (2022). Research on School-based Training System for Novice Teachers in Colleges. Journal of Higher Education Research, doi: 10.32629/jher.v3i3.885

Yildirim, S., & Sahan, H. H. (2011). Information and communication technologies in pre-service teacher education: A survey of open and distance education faculty members. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(3), 95-109.

Yuldasheva, D. M. (2021, January). Methods in teaching english for special purposes esp at instutue of textile and light industry. In Euro-Asia Conferences, 1(1), 17-21