Inside the learning mind: a study of metacognitive behaviors in a public high school
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v11i2.3663Palabras clave:
Metacognición, Consciencia metacognitiva, Conhecimento da cogniciónResumen
This study aimed to determine the level of metacognitive awareness among Junior High School (JHS) and Senior High School (SHS) learners in a public national high school, focusing on the two core domains: Knowledge of Cognition and Regulation of Cognition. A quantitative descriptive design was employed using the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory as the standardized instrument. Data were collected from JHS and SHS students and analyzed to determine their metacognitive strengths and weaknesses. Results showed that both groups demonstrated moderately high levels of Knowledge of Cognition. JHS learners scored higher in Declarative and Conditional Knowledge, suggesting a stronger foundational understanding and better decision-making regarding learning strategies. Procedural Knowledge was moderately developed across both groups. In the Regulation of Cognition, learners exhibited strengths in Planning and Comprehension Monitoring, while Evaluation and Debugging Strategies were less developed. JHS students also outperformed SHS learners in several subdomains, indicating a possible decline in metacognitive engagement in higher grade levels. The study concludes that while learners possess promising metacognitive awareness levels, gaps remain in Procedural Knowledge, Information Management, and Evaluation. These findings suggest the need for structured instructional practices explicitly teaching metacognitive strategies to support learners’ academic growth and independent learning. Embedding metacognitive training in classroom activities can help bridge the gap between current abilities and optimal development.
Métricas
Citas
Ahmed, Wondimu & Werf, Margaretha & Kuyper, Hans & Minnaert, Alexander. (2012). Emotions, Self-Regulated Learning, and Achievement in Mathematics: A Growth Curve Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. 105. 150-161. 10.1037/a0030160.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Bardach, L., Klassen, R. M., & Perry, N. E. (2023). The development of students' self-regulated learning: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Educational Psychologist, 58(1), 1–21.
Britania, M. C. B., & Acosta, N. A. A. (2024). Exploring the impact of metacognitive awareness instruction on secondary students' reading comprehension proficiency. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i12-87zenodo.org+2europub.co.uk+2ijsshr.in+2
Bueno, D. C., & Velasquez, Q. F. (2019). Metacognitive skills in problem solving of senior high school STEM strand students. IMRaD Journal, 1(1), 124–132.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Donohoo, J. (2015). Promoting metacognitive awareness. Corwin Connect. Retrieved from https://corwin-connect.com/2015/06/promoting-metacognitive-awareness/
Guzman, M. D. (2019). English reading performance and metacognitive strategies: Implications for students’ academic success. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.04.05
Karaali, G. (2015). Metacognition in the classroom: Motivation and regulation in calculus courses. PRIMUS, 25(5), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1019662
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Kumar, A. P., & Rajasekaran, R. (2021). Validation of Metacognitive Awareness Inventory from a Private Medical University in India. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10, 368. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34761010/
Lao, D. B. C., & Divinagracia, L. S. (2022). Gauging metacognitive awareness and performance of grade 8 mathematics learners using a theory-based alternative assessment. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(2), Article em018. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12385
Limueco, J. M., & Prudente, M. S. (2019). Flipped classroom enhances student's metacognitive awareness. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning (pp. 70–74). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306500.3306507dl.acm.org+1animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph+1
Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Routledge.
Perry, N. E., Hutchinson, L., & Thauberger, C. (2019). Mentoring student teachers to design and implement self-regulated learning practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102899.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_3
Redick, T.S., Shipstead, Z., Wiemers, E.A. et al. What’s Working in Working Memory Training? An Educational Perspective. Educ Psychol Rev 27, 617–633 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9314-6
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022777
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children's knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1091
Suarez, D. M. T., & Tagadiad, C. L. (2023). Students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and cognitive engagement as mediated by beliefs about language learning. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 4(8), 23–40. https://uijrt.com/paper/students-metacognitive-awareness-reading-strategies-cognitive-engagement-mediated-beliefs-language-learning
Veenman, M.V.J., Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M. & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning 1, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Wahyuseptiana, Y. I., Yusuf, M., Gunarhadi, G., & Roemintoyo, R. (2025). Advancing Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) in Teacher Education: Rasch Model among Indonesian Early Childhood Education Students. Ianna Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(1), 357–368. https://iannajournalofinterdisciplinarystudies.com/index.php/1/article/view/466
Weil, L. G., Fleming, S. M., Dumontheil, I., Kilford, E. J., Weil, R. S., Rees, G., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2013). The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 264–271.
Win, M. M., & Myint, M. M. (2022). Validation Study of Metacognitive Awareness Inventory for Myanmar High School Students. Yangon University of Education Research Journal, 3, 1–10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384110200_Validation_Study_of_Metacognitive_Awareness_Inventory_for_Myanmar_High_School_Studentsresearchgate.net
Young, A., & Fry, J. D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1–10. https://studylib.net/doc/25653976/metacognitive-awareness-and-academic-achievement-in-colle
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Karl Bryan Panelo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
O periodico Diversitas Journal expressa que os artigos são de unica responsabilidade dos Autores, conhecedores da legislação Brasileira e internacional. Os artigos são revisados pelos pares e devem ter o cuidado de avisar da possível incidencia de plagiarismo. Contudo o plagio é uma ação incontestavel dos autores. A Diversitas Journal não publicará artigos com indicios de Plagiarismos. Artigos com plagios serão tratados em conformidade com os procedimentos de plagiarismo COPE.
A violação dos direitos autorais constitui crime, previsto no artigo 184, do Código Penal Brasileiro:
“Art. 184 Violar direitos de autor e os que lhe são conexos: Pena – detenção, de 3 (três) meses a 1 (um) ano, ou multa. § 1o Se a violação consistir em reprodução total ou parcial, com intuito de lucro direto ou indireto, por qualquer meio ou processo, de obra intelectual, interpretação, execução ou fonograma, sem autorização expressa do autor, do artista intérprete ou executante, do produtor, conforme o caso, ou de quem os represente: Pena – reclusão, de 2 (dois) a 4 (quatro) anos, e multa.”
