Design and Evaluation of a Customized Campus-Based Learning Management System for Cavite State University–Carmona Campus, Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v11i3.3676Keywords:
Campus-Based Learning Management System, digital learning, blended learningAbstract
This study developed and evaluated a Campus-Based Learning Management System (CLMS) for Cavite State University – Carmona to facilitate access to academic services and online learning for students and educators. You can easily upload lessons, assignments, and quizzes with the system. It has features like deadlines that can be changed, modules that let you interact with them, notifications that come in real time, and a central place to store resources. The design of the CLMS was influenced by a study of how schools work. It also had a Hybrid Search and Recommendation Algorithm (HSRA) to make it easier to find content and make the system respond faster. A mixed-methods approach was employed to evaluate the system's functionality, usability, and performance, involving 122 participants—114 students and 8 faculty members—according to ISO/IEC 25010 software quality standards. The results showed that users were very happy, with weighted mean ratings of 4.50 to 4.54 across all modules. This showed that the system worked well, was easy to use, and was efficient. The CLMS was found to make academic workflows more efficient, help with ongoing learning assessment, and improve communication. Adding enrollment modules, plagiarism detection, and AI-assisted analytics are some ideas for how to make the system even better in the future.
References
Alsadoon, A. (2023). The impact of ICT tools on student learning and teaching efficiency: A review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 1475–1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11490-3
Singh, P., & Hassan, M. A. (2023). Leveraging digital pedagogy for effective learning in the post-pandemic era. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00423-0
Chan, C. L., & Yu, K. L. (2024). Bridging the skills gap: Aligning curriculum with industry needs in the digital age. Journal of Education and Work, 37(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2024.1978452
Reyes, T., Esguerra, M. J., & Dela Cruz, L. R. (2024). Institutional support mechanisms for graduate employability: A Philippine HEI case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.1990774
Martinez, J. D., Santos, A. B., & Villanueva, R. (2023). Evaluating LMS effectiveness in hybrid learning environments: A Philippine university perspective. International Journal of Learning Technologies, 19(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2023.100589
Brown, M. W., & Jackson, S. A. (2023). Barriers to Moodle adoption in higher education: A faculty perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1218–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13230
Domingo, E. R., & Tan, J. L. (2022). Usability issues and adoption challenges in implementing Moodle in Philippine state universities. Philippine Journal of ICT and Education, 12(2), 56–70.
Cruz, M., & Reyes, J. T. (2023). The evolution of LMS in Philippine education: Post-pandemic developments and insights. Philippine Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 23–35.
Commission on Higher Education. (2022). Philippine higher education ICT use report.
Santos, A. A., & Dela Peña, M. P. (2022). Barriers to LMS effectiveness in Philippine HEIs: A usability-centered analysis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 58–72.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Castro, C. R., & Lim, F. N. (2023). Integrating the cognitive-affective theory of learning with multimedia in LMS design. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 21(1), 11–28.
Tan, G., & Manuel, L. B. (2024). Engagement and retention in multimedia-enhanced online courses: A Philippine case study. eLearning and Digital Media, 22(3), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753024123456
Martin, K. R., & Blake, S. D. (2022). Legacy of CBI systems: PLATO, TICCIT, and their influence on modern LMS design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), 865–880.
Navarro, L., & Castillo, H. Y. (2023). Tracing instructional systems from PLATO to Philippine LMS platforms. Philippine Journal of Open Learning, 10(2), 99–110.
Cruz, R. V., & Aquino, F. S. (2024). Standardized e-learning modules in multi-instructor environments: A case study in Southern Luzon. Asian Journal of eLearning and Education, 6(1), 41–55.
Department of Science and Technology–Science Education Institute. (2023). National courseware development project report.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2023). MIT OpenCourseWare: Enhancing learning through multimedia and analytics. https://ocw.mit.edu
Alison. (2024). Free online learning with certification and analytics. https://alison.com
Navarro, G. T., & Linao, S. R. (2023). A comparative review of enterprise LMS platforms in Southeast Asia: Access, cost, and local feasibility. Southeast Asian Journal of Educational Management, 5(3), 91–106.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mark Anthony Abril
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Diversitas Journal expresses that the articles are the sole responsibility of the Authors, who are familiar with Brazilian and international legislation.
Articles are peer-reviewed and care should be taken to warn of the possible incidence of plagiarism. However, plagiarism is an indisputable action by the authors.
The violation of copyright is a crime, provided for in article 184 of the Brazilian Penal Code: “Art. 184 Violating copyright and related rights: Penalty - detention, from 3 (three) months to 1 (one) year, or fine. § 1 If the violation consists of total or partial reproduction, for the purpose of direct or indirect profit, by any means or process, of intellectual work, interpretation, performance or phonogram, without the express authorization of the author, the performer, the producer , as the case may be, or whoever represents them: Penalty - imprisonment, from 2 (two) to 4 (four) years, and a fine. ”
